-
重子非轻子衰变研究中一个悬而未决的问题是描述该类衰变的s波振幅与p波振幅的理论值不能同时与实验值很好地符合. 与以往的文献相比, 本文将采用协变的手征有效理论框架, 在扩展极小减除方案下计算该类衰变的s波、p波振幅的一圈图修正. 为与实验数据相比, 分别采用s波拟合和p波拟合两种途径获得协变理论预言值. 采用s波拟合得到s波协变振幅理论预言值略逊于重重子框架下的理论预言值, 但是由此得到p波协变振幅理论预言值较重重子框架下的理论预言值有较多改善; 采用p波拟合得到p波协变振幅理论预言值贴近实验值, 重重子框架下的理论预言值与实验值相差较大, 由此得到s波协变振幅理论预言值与实验值有明显差距, 但重重子框架下的理论预言值与实验值差距更大. 由此可见, 协变框架下一圈图完整计算中, s波振幅与p波振幅间的理论矛盾依然存在, 但是两者之间矛盾程度与重重子相比得到部分缓解.An unresolved issue in the study of baryon non-leptonic decays is that the theoretical values describing the s- and p-wave amplitudes of such decays cannot simultaneously accord well with experimental values. Compared with previous literature, this paper adopts the covariant chiral effective theory framework and calculates the one-loop corrections to the s- and p-wave amplitudes by using the extended minimal subtraction (EMS) scheme, and also takes into account the contributions from intermediate pion states that are neglected in previous studies (the contributions from intermediate decuplet states are not considered here). Unlike infrared regularization and the extended on-shell subtraction scheme, EMS is easier to implement and also avoids over-subtraction. Apart from the typical chiral logarithmic term mslnms obtained in heavy-baryon formalism, the covariant calculation retains many non-local contributions that are not negligible. These non-local contributions vary with loop diagrams and intermediate states, making the complete covariant results significantly different from those from the simple chiral logarithmic structures in heavy-baryon formalism, which may alleviate the tension between the s- and p-wave components of the decay amplitudes. Subsequent numerical analysis confirms this conjecture. Two approaches are adopted to obtain covariant theoretical predictions: s-wave fitting and p-wave fitting. According to the fitted predictions and chi-squares of fitness, the s-wave fitting yields s-wave predictions slightly inferior to those under heavy-baryon formalism, but the resulting p-wave predictions are considerably improved compared with the heavy-baryon formalism predictions. The p-wave fitting produces p-wave predictions closer to experimental values, while the heavy-baryon predictions differ significantly from the experimental values. The resulting s-wave predictions from p-wave fitting show noticeable discrepancies with experimental data, but the heavy-baryon predictions are even worse. Therefore, working in the covariant framework, the tension between s- and p-wave amplitudes for baryon non-leptonic decays is significantly alleviated in comparison with that in heavy-baryon formalism. In addition, it is found that the contributions from intermediate pion states may be neglected in many cases, but are important and must be kept for decays with smaller experimental values.
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] -
树图 HB(Jenkins) 协变 协变π 协变(π外) 实验 Σ+ → nπ+(s) 0.00 0.02 0.11 0.05 0.06 0.06 ± 0.01 Σ+ → pπ0(s) –1.37 –1.39 –1.60 –0.18 –1.42 –1.38 ± 0.02 Σ– → nπ–(s) 1.94 1.98 2.16 0.36 1.80 1.88 ± 0.01 Λ → pπ–(s) 1.43 1.49 1.58 0.11 1.47 1.38 ± 0.01 Λ → nπ0(s) –1.01 –1.05 –1.19 –0.12 –1.07 –1.03 ± 0.01 Ξ– → nπ–(s) –1.90 –1.76 –1.28 –0.23 –1.05 –1.99 ± 0.01 Ξ0 → nπ0(s) 1.34 1.25 1.03 0.18 0.85 1.51 ± 0.01 Σ+ → nπ+(p) 0.12 0.14 1.03 0.14 0.89 1.81 ± 0.01 Σ+ → pπ0(p) 0.21 0.23 0.72 0.08 0.64 1.24 ± 0.03 Σ– → nπ–(p) –0.18 –0.19 0.02 0.03 –0.01 –0.06 ± 0.01 Λ → pπ–(p) 0.43 1.31 0.38 0.05 0.33 0.63 ± 0.01 Λ → nπ0(p) –0.31 –0.93 –0.27 –0.04 –0.23 –0.41 ± 0.01 Ξ– → nπ–(p) 0.10 –0.21 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.39 ± 0.01 Ξ0 → nπ0(p) –0.07 0.15 –0.14 –0.00 –0.14 –0.27 ± 0.01 hD –0.58 ± 0.09 –0.60 ± 0.12 –0.53 ± 0.35 — — — hF 1.36 ± 0.05 1.00 ± 0.07 0.92 ± 0.20 — — — $ \chi _{1{\text{d}}{\text{.o}}{\text{.f}}}^2 $ 4.15 5.23 1.96 — — — $ \chi _{{\text{2 d}}{\text{.o}}{\text{.f}}}^2 $ 2676.96 3602.73 1403.43 — — — 
下载: 导出CSV
树图 HB(Jenkins) 协变 协变π 协变(π外) 实验 Σ+ → nπ+(s) 0.00 0.05 0.06 0.25 –0.19 0.06 ± 0.01 Σ+ → pπ0(s) –1.37 –1.39 –1.73 –0.31 –1.42 –1.38 ± 0.02 Σ– → nπ–(s) 1.94 2.02 2.13 0.76 1.37 1.88 ± 0.01 Λ → pπ–(s) 1.43 1.58 1.71 0.08 1.63 1.38 ± 0.01 Λ → nπ0(s) –1.01 –1.12 –1.28 –0.06 –1.22 –1.03 ± 0.01 Ξ– → nπ–(s) –1.90 –1.61 –0.99 –0.35 –0.64 –1.99 ± 0.01 Ξ0 → nπ0(s) 1.34 1.14 0.92 0.25 0.67 1.51 ± 0.01 Σ+ → nπ+(p) 0.12 0.13 1.51 0.18 1.33 1.81 ± 0.01 Σ+ → pπ0(p) 0.21 0.25 1.09 0.10 0.99 1.24 ± 0.03 Σ– → nπ–(p) –0.18 –0.22 –0.03 0.05 –0.08 –0.06 ± 0.01 Λ → pπ–(p) 0.43 0.98 0.33 0.09 0.24 0.63 ± 0.01 Λ → nπ0(p) –0.31 –0.70 –0.23 –0.06 –0.17 –0.41 ± 0.01 Ξ– → nπ–(p) 0.10 –0.36 0.56 0.05 0.51 0.39 ± 0.01 Ξ0 → nπ0(p) –0.07 0.26 –0.40 –0.03 –0.37 –0.27 ± 0.01 hD –0.58 ± 0.09 –0.49 ± 0.12 –0.47 ± 0.31 — — — hF 1.36 ± 0.05 0.71 ± 0.07 0.71 ± 0.19 — — — $ \chi _{1{\text{d}}{\text{.o}}{\text{.f}}}^2 $ 4.15 5.21 1.98 — — — $ \chi _{{\text{2 d}}{\text{.o}}{\text{.f}}}^2 $ 2676.96 3620.78 1556.18 — — —
下载: 导出CSV
树图 HB(Jenkins) 协变 协变π 协变(π外) 实验 Σ+ → nπ+(s) 0.00 0.02 0.22 0.16 0.06 0.06 ± 0.01 Σ+ → pπ0(s) –5.57 –3.31 –2.69 –0.31 –2.38 –1.38 ± 0.02 Σ– → nπ–(s) 7.89 4.70 3.81 0.61 3.20 1.88 ± 0.01 Λ → pπ–(s) 4.01 1.83 2.76 0.24 2.52 1.38 ± 0.01 Λ → nπ0(s) –2.83 –1.29 –2.02 –0.19 –1.83 –1.03 ± 0.01 Ξ– → nπ–(s) –6.83 –3.27 –2.28 –0.41 –1.87 –1.99 ± 0.01 Ξ0 → nπ0(s) 4.83 2.31 1.73 0.30 1.43 1.51 ± 0.01 Σ+ → nπ+(p) 1.45 1.29 1.81 0.25 1.56 1.81 ± 0.01 Σ+ → pπ0(p) 0.87 0.54 1.29 0.14 1.15 1.24 ± 0.03 Σ– → nπ–(p) 0.21 0.53 –0.02 0.05 –0.07 –0.06 ± 0.01 Λ → pπ–(p) 0.74 0.82 0.65 0.09 0.56 0.63 ± 0.01 Λ → nπ0(p) –0.52 –0.58 –0.46 –0.07 –0.39 –0.41 ± 0.01 Ξ– → nπ–(p) 0.84 0.69 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.39 ± 0.01 Ξ0 → nπ0(p) –0.60 –0.49 –0.26 –0.00 –0.26 –0.27 ± 0.01 hD –3.46 ± 0.87 –1.95 ± 0.67 –0.93 ± 0.02 — — — hF 4.43 ± 1.34 1.67 ± 0.62 1.58 ± 0.04 — — — $ \chi _{1{\text{d}}{\text{.o}}{\text{.f}}}^2 $ 98.97 15.57 8.51 — — — $ \chi _{{\text{2 d}}{\text{.o}}{\text{.f}}}^2 $ 71376.35 10276.18 6026.18 — — —
下载: 导出CSV
树图 HB(Jenkins) 协变 协变π 协变(π外) 实验 Σ+ → nπ+(s) 0.00 0.05 0.11 0.35 –0.24 0.06 ± 0.01 Σ+ → pπ0(s) –5.57 –3.45 –2.07 –0.38 –1.69 –1.38 ± 0.02 Σ– → nπ–(s) 7.89 4.93 2.66 0.97 1.69 1.88 ± 0.01 Λ → pπ–(s) 4.01 1.99 2.45 0.13 2.32 1.38 ± 0.01 Λ → nπ0(s) –2.83 –1.41 –1.80 –0.09 –1.71 –1.03 ± 0.01 Ξ– → nπ–(s) –6.83 –2.93 –1.37 –0.44 –0.93 –1.99 ± 0.01 Ξ0 → nπ0(s) 4.83 2.07 1.19 0.31 0.88 1.51 ± 0.01 Σ+ → nπ+(p) 1.45 1.43 1.76 0.22 1.54 1.81 ± 0.01 Σ+ → pπ0(p) 0.87 0.60 1.38 0.12 1.26 1.24 ± 0.03 Σ– → nπ–(p) 0.21 0.59 –0.19 0.05 –0.24 –0.06 ± 0.01 Λ → pπ–(p) 0.74 0.83 0.59 0.12 0.47 0.63 ± 0.01 Λ → nπ0(p) –0.52 –0.58 –0.42 –0.08 –0.34 –0.41 ± 0.01 Ξ– → nπ–(p) 0.84 0.38 0.55 0.05 0.50 0.39 ± 0.01 Ξ0 → nπ0(p) –0.60 –0.27 –0.39 –0.03 –0.36 –0.27 ± 0.01 hD –3.46 ± 0.87 –1.46 ± 0.46 –0.51 ± 0.05 — — — hF 4.43 ± 1.34 1.22 ± 0.45 0.96 ± 0.10 — — — $ \chi _{1{\text{d}}{\text{.o}}{\text{.f}}}^2 $ 98.97 16.37 3.41 — — — $ \chi _{{\text{2 d}}{\text{.o}}{\text{.f}}}^2 $ 71376.35 10.647.20 2529.84 — — —
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 414
- PDF下载量: 24
- 被引次数: 0